In the reading A History of Internet Art, I read that net. art and hacking are similar. My definition of hacking when it comes to mind is: opening and taking an information that one may want on a device that has a lock on it. That device can be anything.
Now, is all net.art basically stolen material from another domain and just renamed and called ready-made art by the artist who post it?
: Cosic, who was vilified in the press as an "Eastern European hacker," once commented that the poached Documenta site was his readymade and proclaimed that net.artists are "Duchamp's ideal children."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment